Skip to main content

Call Social Services- British society has long-term plan to abuse newly-born child.



                                                    Happy Birthday !

           The new British Royal Prince has barely been on the planet 24 hours but he has already been put to work. His job as Prince (name) of Cambridge has already been decided. Isn't this compulsory labour ? Won't his child-hood be shadowed by the expectation to act according to his job?  Shouldn't we at least ask him if he wants to be a Prince?
           Not satisfied with child exploitation, British society will be grooming him for his future job that, in all probability, will be 40 or 50 years from now. It has already been decided that, at some point in the future he will become King. And we expect him to be King until he his dead.
          So that's the little fellow's life mapped out for him then. How kind of us. No wonder we can't contain our excitement.

          Before catching his first breath, before any chance to look around or smile at his mum, it has been ordered that this child's natural abilities and hopes and desires will all be subsumed to the role that we have already decided for him. It will not matter if he dreams of being a footballer or an artist, or of living in a cave in Scotland. We know what we want, and his wants don't, and won't, come into it. Isn't this just a bit cruel?

           Clearly, Britain likes having a Royal family. The phrase is often heard that our Royal family makes you "proud to be British." Are we really proud of bullying infants and encouraging a culture that suggests some people are born special and others are not ? Doesn't this kind of culture positively reek of Naziism?
           But, how can this be when we are taught so clearly that the plucky Brits stood firm against the evils of Hitler ?
          
           As always, information gives idea-

                                 Herr Hitler invites us into his lovely home.


           This is from the November 1938 edition of the British magazine Homes and Gardens. The article takes us Hello-style through the sophisticated living quarters of the man who that very month was to order Kristallnacht.  Corporate Britain of the time didn't seem to find too much disagreeable in the "droll raconteur " who kindly gave a "fun-fair" for local children.

           Corporate Britain of now, sees nothing disagreeable in the current system that happily robs a child of his possible dreams even before his umbilical has been cut, in order to perpetuate a society where we are allowed tantalising glimpses of the top of Mount Olympus thanks to a media that exists to make a profit from the gods that they create.
            And all of this made possible by a culture of anti-communication.

         The Nazis were very big on anti-communication.
         I thought we won,  didn't we ?
 

Comments

  1. Myeral25 July 2013 at 13:17

    Interesting - humanitarian - take on the thing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cleopatra, a cowboy, then screaming!. - How we understand things.

“We, ignorant of ourselves, Beg often our own harms, which the wise powers Deny us for our good; so find we profit By losing of our prayers.”                 “Finish, good lady; the bright day is done, And we are for the Dark. ” ― William Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra   Cleopatra, a cowboy, then....screaming!       Presented with this information, how does the brain deal with it? Necessarily, the brain must deal with it as it does with all information:                                 Information -------------> Idea        Consequently, you might sort it out like this:                        Cleopatra   --------------> Queen Of Egypt                        A cowboy   --------------> Tom Mix                       Screaming! --------------> Expressing a strong emotional state         And then, in an example of the fundamentally creative aspect of basic communication, our brains start to fill in the blanks, to describe and e
Post a Comment
Read more

A whale is a tree; obviously.

When I was young enough to be sat in school within glancing distance of a small library space that was dominated by a Miffy Wendy house# and contained, in my opinion, far too many Miffy books, yet just old enough to be offended that people would think that I would want to read about Miffy; the cover of one book spoke louder than all of those that surrounded it and thoroughly intrigued me.     The title of this book was: Jonah and the Whale.     Of course, this title referred to the famous Bible story, but at that age (maybe I was five or six) I don't think I knew of it. What I did know was what a whale was: a massive fish*, and that Jonah was someone's name, probably because of Ken Reid's comic character: Jonah . Jonah- not the Biblical one     So, the book's cover was something that drew my interest because, I wondered, why did the cover show an illustration of a man sitting under a tree? It was similar to this: Jonah...and... something.        Why did
1 comment
Read more

The Revenge of The Bicameral Brain!

I bet they wished they hadn't bothered.       Hitler, like you or me, had a brain that operated in the same basic way as any ; that is to say, on the most basic principle of: Information -------------------> Idea. For example, presented with the information of the movie poster above, you would probably envisage Nazi scientists gathered around a tank* of fluid, in which is kept alive the titular thinking organ. You would, however, be wrong:                                                                    They saved Hitler's head and shoulders.                               Of course, any movie offering this title would not instill in the prospective movie-goer the necessary sense of horror, dread and creepy interest, and quite possibly would suggest that someone had managed to dig out Der Fuhrer's old shampoo bottle.** Which is not quite the same thing.        Anyway, as the brain works most basically as info -----------> idea , it turns out that a
Post a Comment
Read more