Skip to main content

Call Social Services- British society has long-term plan to abuse newly-born child.



                                                    Happy Birthday !

           The new British Royal Prince has barely been on the planet 24 hours but he has already been put to work. His job as Prince (name) of Cambridge has already been decided. Isn't this compulsory labour ? Won't his child-hood be shadowed by the expectation to act according to his job?  Shouldn't we at least ask him if he wants to be a Prince?
           Not satisfied with child exploitation, British society will be grooming him for his future job that, in all probability, will be 40 or 50 years from now. It has already been decided that, at some point in the future he will become King. And we expect him to be King until he his dead.
          So that's the little fellow's life mapped out for him then. How kind of us. No wonder we can't contain our excitement.

          Before catching his first breath, before any chance to look around or smile at his mum, it has been ordered that this child's natural abilities and hopes and desires will all be subsumed to the role that we have already decided for him. It will not matter if he dreams of being a footballer or an artist, or of living in a cave in Scotland. We know what we want, and his wants don't, and won't, come into it. Isn't this just a bit cruel?

           Clearly, Britain likes having a Royal family. The phrase is often heard that our Royal family makes you "proud to be British." Are we really proud of bullying infants and encouraging a culture that suggests some people are born special and others are not ? Doesn't this kind of culture positively reek of Naziism?
           But, how can this be when we are taught so clearly that the plucky Brits stood firm against the evils of Hitler ?
          
           As always, information gives idea-

                                 Herr Hitler invites us into his lovely home.


           This is from the November 1938 edition of the British magazine Homes and Gardens. The article takes us Hello-style through the sophisticated living quarters of the man who that very month was to order Kristallnacht.  Corporate Britain of the time didn't seem to find too much disagreeable in the "droll raconteur " who kindly gave a "fun-fair" for local children.

           Corporate Britain of now, sees nothing disagreeable in the current system that happily robs a child of his possible dreams even before his umbilical has been cut, in order to perpetuate a society where we are allowed tantalising glimpses of the top of Mount Olympus thanks to a media that exists to make a profit from the gods that they create.
            And all of this made possible by a culture of anti-communication.

         The Nazis were very big on anti-communication.
         I thought we won,  didn't we ?
 

Comments

  1. Myeral25 July 2013 at 13:17

    Interesting - humanitarian - take on the thing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Apollo 11, The Sistine Chapel, and un-educated fleas: how communication is both effortlessly simple and ineffably complex (at the same time):

 The fundamental organic process of communication, the instinctive process that forms the basis of the functions of the nervous system, the brain, all understanding, intelligence, and language use, can be most simply described as:  (Where information is anything that exists or can be imagined, and idea is any information that is connected to, or can be connected to, the first information .) Thus it is that, as far as the basic process of communication is concerned, it is simple enough for babies, bees, and even un- educated fleas to do it. The most basic idea we have about anything is emotional or sensational . If the process were only as described above we would only ever be able to react to any information with our instinctive feelings. However, as any idea is fundamentally information , as soon as this process begins, it is immediately recursive: Although, in fact, the commencement of the communicative process is akin to a stone being dropped into a pond, with rippl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cleopatra, a cowboy, then screaming!. - How we understand things.

“We, ignorant of ourselves, Beg often our own harms, which the wise powers Deny us for our good; so find we profit By losing of our prayers.”                 “Finish, good lady; the bright day is done, And we are for the Dark. ” ― William Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra   Cleopatra, a cowboy, then....screaming!       Presented with this information, how does the brain deal with it? Necessarily, the brain must deal with it as it does with all information:                                 Information -------------> Idea        Consequently, you might sort it out like this:               ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stranger in a Strange Land: the asking and checking skills of Grok

  Grok:  Bela Lugosi’s pyramid is a critical thinking model that places the question "What is it?" at its apex, emphasizing asking and checking as essential for understanding information and ideas. The July 2013 post expands this concept, arguing that these skills (symbolized as "Bela Lugosi") are suppressed by power structures globally, leading to poor communication likened to "barking." In Japan, cultural norms exacerbate this issue by discouraging direct questioning and articulation, as seen in classroom anecdotes and language learning. The phrase "Bela Lugosi is unwell" reflects the global neglect of these skills, with Japan as a stark example. The pyramid calls for reviving asking and checking to foster better communication and societal progress. If you’d like me to explore specific aspects further (e.g., Japan’s cultural context, other examples, or related sources), analyze the referenced Wikipedia link on debate, or search for additional c...
Post a Comment
Read more